lifting global holdings to an all-time peak of 4,025 tonnes and assets
under management to US$559 billion. After years of sitting quietly
alongside central banks, ETF investors turned into the second engine of
the bull market.¹²
product. Net inflows to physically backed gold ETFs totalled 801.2
tonnes during 2025 — the second-strongest year on record and the largest
on a dollar basis.¹ Assets under management closed the year at US$559
billion, and holdings reached a new historical peak of 4,025 tonnes.²
biggest single month of inflows ever recorded for the category, and the
third quarter as a whole took in US$26 billion — the strongest quarter
in the history of the series.² The pattern was consistent with the
underlying price: as gold rallied through the LBMA PM reference to new
all-time highs 53 times during the year, ETF buyers pressed in rather
than taking profits.³
magnitude relative to the installed base. The tonnage added during the
year equated to roughly 25 percent of the holdings that existed at the
end of 2024, a ratio only matched in the first flush of product adoption
two decades ago.
problem — giving institutional investors a way to own gold without the
operational friction of physical bars. For most of their first decade
they were a small sleeve in diversified portfolios. The 2025 flows
suggest a different role now.
moved toward 5-7 percent positioning as the combination of geopolitical
risk, currency weakness and central-bank accumulation reinforced the
structural case. The move was large enough to show up in sector rotation
data: equity inflows to precious-metals miners followed the ETF flows,
with Brazilian, Canadian, Australian and US gold majors all
participating in the bid.
management. Advisers who had spent a decade explaining why a
non-yielding asset belonged in a portfolio began to field the opposite
question from clients: whether the existing allocation was large enough
given the price path.
at the centre of the 2025 story, with sustained inflows almost every
month of the year and acceleration from July onwards.¹ European ETFs
turned decisively positive after a slow start, and Asian-listed products
recorded their best year since 2020. The common thread was macro:
rate-cut expectations across major central banks, a weakening US dollar
and persistent geopolitical risk created a single underlying thesis that
investors everywhere were trading.
bar-and-coin buyers had dominated the investment demand story,
particularly in India and China where 2025 full-year bar-and-coin
investment reached US$154 billion.¹ During the second half of 2025 ETF
flows caught up and then overtook the bar-and-coin channel in dollar
terms for several consecutive months — a sign that Western institutional
money had fully engaged with the theme.
demand at the start of a cycle and lead it near the end. The 2025
pattern fits that description: bar-and-coin buyers established the price
floor in 2023 and 2024, and ETF inflows arrived once the trend was
established, amplifying it rather than initiating it. That sequencing is
a reassuring signal for the durability of the move — a rally that began
with value-conscious physical buyers and only later attracted
momentum-driven ETF flows is qualitatively different from one led by
speculative positioning alone.
products hold physical gold against outstanding shares, incremental
demand flows directly into physical buying — and that physical buying
into the price. During 2025 this feedback loop amplified already-strong
flows from central banks and bar-and-coin buyers, pushing the LBMA PM
annual average to US$3,431 per ounce (up 44 percent year on year) and
the Q4 average to US$4,135 per ounce (up 55 percent).³
symmetrically. Outflows can accelerate a correction as easily as inflows
can extend a rally. The fact that the 2025 flows were dominated by
positive net additions, and that the product base has grown to a
historical record, means the market is now watching ETF data as
carefully as central-bank reports. It has become the fastest-moving
signal in the gold demand stack.
The 2025 cohort of ETF buyers was less homogenous than prior cycles.
banks, family offices — were the steadiest contributors through the
year. Retail activity rose sharply in the third and fourth quarters as
gold price milestones became mainstream news. Meanwhile systematic and
discretionary hedge-fund positioning reached multi-year highs, with
several large macro funds disclosing gold positions as core rather than
tactical.
distinct cohorts — buy-and-hold wealth channels, tactical hedge funds,
and retail — has a broader and more resilient bid than one dominated by
any single group. That structural feature is part of why pullbacks in
prices, and a flag from one group qui